Maison Francis Kurkdjian Lumière Noire pour Homme: it’s black light!

Lumiere Noire pour Homme

I have become extremely weary of perfumes that feature the adjective “noir” in their names… For some strange reason most “black” perfumes are fussy, sweet concoctions that try to hide layers of troubled nuances under tons of thick, opaque, gourmand, ambery bases. Reviews of Limière Noire pour Homme tend to carry this theme and most reviewers smell an imaginary black rose, full of spices and darkness. My experience with this scent however was very different. This is definitely a rose, a big one, unapologetic, pink, in full bloom. It’s dewy, soft and creamy. It wraps you with huge cashmere wings and lifts you in the air in a swirl of sensational, velvety glory. The first time I tried it I decided that I had to have it, right there, on the spot. If there is one perfume that manages to imitate the the sensation of sipping champagne, then this is definitely it! I don’t get a lot of development from it. Rose comes first, middle and last. In the beginning it is coupled with a gorgeous peachy fuzz, but many roses out there come with a hint of fruit in their natural bouquet. As it progresses it fizzes and rises, the same way champagne is pushed to the rim of the glass by the oomph of its bubbles. At that point Lumière Noire is a little intimidating. I have never come across a “pour homme” fragrance smell so unabashedly feminine. This is pink, pink, pink all the way, trumpeting loud the joy of life, holding nothing back. The fact that the sprayer explodes a huge rain of scented drops on the skin with the slightest touch will not encourage those who are weak at heart to wear it. It is not an easy perfume to wear. It’s sillage is a monstrous fleshy rose. In terms of longevity it can only be compared with Balck Aoud. Even if sprayed directly on skin it will scent all your clothes till after the next wash. I rarely wear it when I go out for fear of eclipsing any other smell in the vicinity and all life form in it. What makes it even less politically correct is that in the end it is nothing but a chypre. Reading the official note listing I cannot really understand where the chypre genes come from. There is patchouli in it, but it is the kind of elegant, muted patchouli found in Tom Ford White Patchouli. Nothing earthy or remotely resinous. There is no oakmoss but maybe artemisia does the trick when coupled with a bit of cumin. There is cinnamon listed but I cannot say I have ever been able to single it out from the rest of the ingredients. I can’t resist wearing it at home however because this is simply the scent of joie de vivre, a life force and forceful declaration of happiness.

In a sense what surprised me and made me buy this bottle is announced by the name itself. Lumière Noire is french for black light. And this makes perfect sense. This is a club scent that has survived the passage from the late 70’s to the early 80’s. It parties hard and never sleeps until the sun starts burning the skin. It’s Bianca Jagger riding a horse while Halston throws his head back and Liza Minelli stares feverishly. It is an “all in” declaration, no scruples, no remorse. There is no tomorrow because tomorrow we will still be here.


Notes from Parfumo: Mugwort, Cumin, Patchouli, Rose, Cinnamon

Lumière Noire pour Homme notes

Notes from my nose: rose, chypre, party sweat


About Christos

Scientifically minded but obsessed with the subjective aspect of things. Photos copyright of MemoryOfScent, with special thanks to Pantelis Makkas You are welcome to link to my blog but you are definitely not allowed to copy text or use the photos without my permission. All text and main photos are originals and property of MemoryOfScent All perfumes are from my collection unless stated otherwise.


  1. You make this sound DIVINE (in capital letters)! I really love your champagne descriptions of this rose, and I will definitely seek this out. Can’t believe I haven’t already, as I love (and own) his Absolue Pour le Soir.

    Oh, and you made me giggle with this: “For some strange reason most ‘black’ perfumes are fussy, sweet concoctions that try to hide layers of troubled nuances under tons of thick, opaque, gourmand, ambery bases.” So true! 😀

    • It is DIVINE! And this is the pour homme I am talking about. I am sure I also smelt the pour femme but I think it was a lot more conventional. And possibly a tad less feminine…. LOL

  2. Ana

    Christhos,I so love your reviews!I don’t always comment,but always lurking on your blog.I haven’t tried the pour homme version of Lumiere Noir but it sounds so much more like what I wanted the pour femme version to be.And you’re absolutely right about the feminine counterpart of this perfume,dead on.Conventional yes and I don’t do conventional very often and certainly not when it comes to roses.

    • Hi Ana. As you can see iI am just reemerging after a period of a very, very slow posting and reading as well. So nice to see you here again.

      The pour femme was totally unimpressive I think. On another note, I find myself more and more attracted by fruity notes, which is strange for me.

  3. Pingback: Niki de Saint Phalle eau de toilette: a walk in the garden of good and evil | Memory Of Scent

  4. Pingback: Lumiere Noire Pour Homme by Francis Kurkdjian for Maison Francis Kurkdjian 2009 « AustralianPerfumeJunkies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: